But Col 1:15-20, what I’m calling
the Song of Christ, goes further. It declares that in all this vast universe,
Jesus stands supreme. He is first. In Greek, ‘first’ is πρῶτος [prōtos], and it occurs in our
passage three times.
- 1:15b - the Son is “the firstborn (πρωτότοκος/prōtotokos) of all creation”
- 1:18c - the Son is “the firstborn (πρωτότοκος/prōtotokos) from among the dead”
- 1:18d - “in order that he himself might become in all things preeminent(πρωτεύων/prōteuōn)”
Prōtotokos denotes first in sequence (for
example, in the sense of firstborn brother, as frequently in the Greek Old
Testament). It also has a qualitative sense, as in ‘foremost.’ I would argue
that both are at work in 1:15. Here Jesus shares with creation that they both
are of God. Yet, Jesus is uniquely God’s image (v.15a) and all of creation
comes to be through him (v. 16). Colossians is making clear that Jesus and
creation are intimately associated, though the Son is distinctly different; he
is ‘firstborn.’
Apse, Duomo, Monreale, Italy by RRC |
The most curious of the three is v.
18d - which the New Revised Standard Version translates “so that he might come
to have first place in everything.” Up until this line, there really was no
reason to assume the Son held anything but first place - he is, after all,
firstborn of all creation, and instrumental in creating (v. 16), he is before
all things and all things hold together in him (v. 17). Yet now we are told that
the son retakes first place. (Prōteuō
is a verb that means to be first and is here combined with the verb gignomai, “to become.”) Come to think of
it, why in v. 20 does it say that he made peace (vv. 15-17 do not suggest
anyway that peace was lost) and that he reconciled all things (vv. 15-17 do not
suggest that things were alienated from God)? Where did this strife and alienation
come from, and why are there dead (v. 18) for that matter?
It seems to me like something
happened between the first part of the song, which clearly states the Son was
supreme over all things, and the second part of the song, which says that the
Son had to be first from the dead and become (again) first over all things by
pacifying and reconciling them. (It’s kind of ironic he accomplish this through
his execution on the cross.) I’ll say what I think the missing link is
tomorrow.
Right now, I wish only to point out
that the universe (for some reason) did not go as it seems it should have. Created
things (rulers and authorities? humans?) asserted their independence from the Son,
perhaps even attempted to supplant him. But the son, who cannot be escaped (see
yesterday’s post), will also not be denied his rightful place. The Son simply
is first.
To make the confession that Jesus is
Lord is to say he is first. But while this confession is something we do, an
allegiance we make, it is also important to know that it is an acknowledgement
of an undeniable fact, one that is independent of us. We do not make Jesus
first. He will be, whether we say so or not. Again, as with what we learned
yesterday, this disturbs our sense of self-importance. It also should give us
peace; Jesus is not depending on us to make us first. And what is more, there
is no force that can stop him from being first.
1 comment:
Thank you, Dr. Cox! I was just discussing this concept of Christ as the firstborn over all creation with a friend from China. She is a new Christian and is trying to answer some Jehovah's Witnesses on the topic of Christ as God. She was having a hard time understanding how to answer their assertion the Jesus is just the firstborn human, but that he is not God. This explication of the passage and the word "firstborn" is really helpful. I emailed it to her. Perfect timing! Thanks for posting this! What a rich truth to be in Christ, the Firstborn and the Creator, He is worth celebrating ceaselessly!
Post a Comment